Fountain in Pomepii Overflowing (Photo by Author) |
Water
was used for more than just drinking and creating decorations in ancient Rome,
in fact it had a major role to play in the sanitation of the city. With a
population of over a million people, waste is created in massive amounts very
quickly. And because there is no modern plumbing system, most Romans were left
with containers full of waste that they had to dispose of. How? By dumping it
in the street of course! This may seem counter-productive, but the sewer system
of Rome was the most efficient of its time and the ability to transport sewage
from the city to this level kept it clean and healthy, one of the major factors
in allowing for it to reach the size that it did.
![]() |
Outlet of the Cloaca Maxima to the Tiber River (http://ancientrome.ru/art/artworken/img.htm?id=65) |
How
could they do this when a buildup of waste in the streets no doubt breeds
disease? Well, the key features to remedying this are public fountains. Due to
aqueducts stemming from non-stop natural water resources they cannot be turned
off and on. That means if there is too much water in the system, the fountains will
overflow. The frequent overflowing of the fountains from rain or from not
enough use, generated wastewater that swept through the streets and took the
refuse down the many drains into the sewers located under the city. The sewer
pipes would then transport the sewage away from the city via the Cloaca Maxima,
which emptied its contents into the Tiber – much like most of our modern sewer
systems minus the treatment step.
Though
Rome had an operating system as early as the ninth century BCE, it is truly
under the Emperors that the system sees its peak, as with most monuments. Many
of them understood the importance of keeping the city clean and invested large
sums of money into developing and maintaining the system.
Bibliography
Dodge, Hazel. "Greater than the Pyramids': The Water Supply of
Ancient Rome." Edited by
Hazel Dodge. In Ancient Rome: The Archaeology of
the Eternal City, edited by Jon Coulston, 166-209. Oxford: Oxford
University School of Archaeology, 2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment